Open Access
Issue
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 253, 2021
ANIMMA 2021 – Advancements in Nuclear Instrumentation Measurement Methods and their Applications
Article Number 11008
Number of page(s) 5
Section Current Trends in Development of Radiation Detectors
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202125311008
Published online 19 November 2021
  1. D. H. Wilkinson, “The Phoswich-A Multiple Phosphor”, Review of Scientific Instruments, vol. 23, no. 8, Aug. 1952, 10.1063/1.1746324. [Google Scholar]
  2. Matthew J.I. Balmer, “Comparative analysis of pulse shape discrimination methods in a Li-6 loaded plastic scintillator”, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A, Vol. 788, Jul 2015, 10.1016/j.nima.2015.03.089. [Google Scholar]
  3. C.S. Sosa, “Comparison of analog and digital pulse-shapediscrimination systems”, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A, Vol. 826, May 2016, 10.1016/j.nima.2016.03.088. [Google Scholar]
  4. T. S. Sanderson, “Machine learning for digital pulse shape discrimination”, 2012 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference Record (NSS/MIC), Oct. 2012, 10.1109/NSSMIC.2012.6551092. [Google Scholar]
  5. P. Holl, “Deep learning based pulse shape discrimination for germanium detectors”, The European Physical Journal C, Vol. 79. no. 450, Jun. 2019, 10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-6869-2. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. M. Flaska, “Identification of shielded neutron sources with the liquid scintillator BC-501A using a digital pulse shape discrimination method”, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A, Vol. 577, Jul 2007, 10.1016/j.nima.2007.04.141. [Google Scholar]
  7. M. Nakhostin, “Application of digital zero-crossing technique for neutron–gamma discrimination in liquid organic scintillation detectors”, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A, Vol. 621, Sep. 2010, 10.1016/j.nima.2010.06.252. [Google Scholar]