Open Access
Issue
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 170, 2018
ANIMMA 2017 – Advancements in Nuclear Instrumentation Measurement Methods and their Applications
Article Number 07015
Number of page(s) 6
Section Safeguards, homeland security
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/201817007015
Published online 10 January 2018
  1. A.P. Simpson, et al., “A review of neutron detection technology alternatives to helium-3 for safeguards applications,” INMM 52nd Annual Meeting, vol. 8, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  2. P. Peerani, et al., “Testing on novel neutron detectors as alternatives to 3He for security applications,” Nucl. Instr. and Meth. A, vol. 696, pp. 110–120, Dec. 2012. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. P. Buzhan, et al., “Silicon photomultiplier and its possible applications,” Nucl. Instr. and Meth. A vol. 504, no. 1-3, pp. 48–52, May 2003. [Google Scholar]
  4. P. K. Lightfoot, “Characterisation of a silicon photomultiplier device for applications in liquid argon based neutrino physics and dark matter searches,” Journal of Instrumentation, vol. 3, Oct. 2008. [Google Scholar]
  5. AdvanSiD, Trento, Italy [Google Scholar]
  6. First Sensor, Berlin, Germany [Google Scholar]
  7. Hamamatsu, Shizuoka Prefecture, Japan [Google Scholar]
  8. Ketek, Munich, Germany [Google Scholar]
  9. SensL, Cork, Ireland [Google Scholar]
  10. R. Brun and F. Rademakers, “ROOT – An object oriented data analysis framework,” Nucl. Instr. and Meth. A., vol. 389, no. 1-2, pp. 81–86, Apr. 1997. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Eljen, Sweetwater, Texas, United States of America [Google Scholar]
  12. M. L. Roush, “Pulse shape discrimination,” Nuclear Instruments and Methods, vol. 31, no.1, pp. 112–124, Dec. 1964. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. C. Liao and H. Yang, “Pulse shape discrimination using EJ-299-33 plastic scintillator coupled with a Silicon Photomultiplier array,” Nucl. Instr. and Meth. A., vol. 789, pp. 150–157, Jul. 2015. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]